Supreme Court Rule 20 Compliance

1. Supreme Court Rule 20.1
                The Plaintiff/Petitioner swears and affirms being aware that writs of mandamus are discretional and rarely used.  The mandamus for a NARROW and SPECIFIC order that the Plaintiff/Petitioner not be attributed to nude images, whether done by Plaintiff/Petitioner or not, returned in image searches for his personal name while a JURY determines PUNITIVE damages.  Relief has already been sought in United States Court for the Western District of Arkansas and the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. No other legal venue exists since no other Court has immediate discretional jurisdiction.

2. Supreme Court Rule 20.2

          Plaintiff/Petitioner has pleaded in forma pauperis and has filed paper copies as required and sent discs by US Mail to Defendant Counsels and makes digital copies available to the public perpetually via perpetually unregulated WIRE COMMUNICATIONS at <CurtisNeeley.com/5-09-cv-05151/Docket> Plaintiff/Petitioner filed Petition for Certiorari (10-6091). Opposing Counselors filed response waivers and received notifications of this related Mandamus Action with waivers and have not filed timely waivers or replies.
3. Supreme Court Rule 20.3

          Plaintiff/Petitioner asks the extraordinary Writ of Mandamus require the FCC not allow broadcast of nudes not allowed on public television to be attributed to the Plaintiff/Petitioner and that Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren or other Western District of Arkansas Judge be required to enter an injunctive order and allow all named parties to be allowed added for trial early in 2011, as is now scheduled.    

9