REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION

1.  The trafficing of pornography has been illegal since “WIRE COMMUNICATIONS” was first disguised as the Internet.  Rating of sites for avoidance should have been done when the Internet first developed so that the computer purchasers determined pornography viewership permanently for all uses of the computer. This would not require filters that can be avoided or fooled.  This capability can be required now by the FCC and is extremely trivial.

2.     Moral rights known missing from US Title 17 are allegedly recognized for Canadians, Chinese, Australians, and citizens of all “Berne Treaty” signatory nations except the United States making US Title 17 violate the 14^th Amendment now as well as the Fifth and Ninth.

3.      This litigation will easily result in the broadest impact of any ruling ever made by Courts since the 1960s or perhaps ever because it impacts every user of WIRE COMMUNICATIONS on earth as well as morally anchoring US Title 17.

4.       This same action is concurrently submitted in a Petition for Certiorari.

Curtis J Neeley Jr v NameMedia Inc., et al., (10-6091), however, this extraordinary writ of mandamus directing the United States Court for the Western District of Arkansas to enter an injunctive order and also permitting service of the Amended Complaint attached to Docket 167 on all desired parties would prevent the Petitioner from facing constant defamation while awaiting JURY actions.  A narrow and specific Mandamus Order requiring the FCC begin regulating communications by wire are the only extraordinary relief herein plead.  Granting of this extraordinary relief would allow the Petitioner to have a JURY resolve this in March 2011 and halt the current continual defamation. Discretionary Supreme Court jurisdiction is the only type jurisdiction for immediate relief.

7