Neeley v NameMedia Inc et
MORAL copy[rite] ruled to not apply on wire communications ^^^
NameMedia Inc et al, (5:12-cv-05074)
Dismissed without prejudice encouraging correcting and refiling
Dockets linked above were claimed to cost
Google Inc one-quarter million dollars plus by Google Inc in Court
This was spent
to keep porn traficked to kids and addicts!
The Supreme Court is already
VERY following this issue.
Neeley Jr v FCC et al, (5:12-cv-5208)
The above ends the open porn-by wire and radio known as "the internet" >>>
See who and close to where you are at the IP linked above.
All links open their own
The Plaintiff is severely brain
injured but it obviously no longer an idiot. Plaintiff once wrote CIRS reservation software and although not
remembering most of his life's past. The Plaintiff remembers enough Perl 5 to write a "script" to cause this page to identify
text will be colored.
The way it is are colored will describe the
considers Google's position - or BACKWARDS and wrong!.
If you are NOT a GOUGUL Attorney reload the page and see what they see.
Halton & Doan attorneys may reload the page till fingers are blue! Billable clicking?
If 66581 is < 15 is false when you arrive it is already wrong!
You can reload and see it as right
as the Plaintiff is in 30 sec. It might never be.
|All search engine Defendants traffic in
See them each
showing Plaintiff's NUDE ART
to children except IAC/InterActiveCorp who ceased when requested!
The following links are
searches for the Plaintiff's name in image searches and are NOT child friendly except ASK.com and LYCOS.com and
WHY THIS LAWSUIT MUST BE DONE
why the FCC is
a primary defendant.
NONE of the Plaintiff's photos are
pornographic on LYCOS.com- -
NONE of the Plaintiff's
photos are pornographic on ASK.com - -
Trafficking in PORNOGRAPHY BY
Search Engines is
OBVIOUSLY NOT accidental?
WHY IS IT ALLOWED!
IT SOON WON'T BE!
Please donate to cover filing fees.
Porn for logged-in adults will remain allowed.