Rabbit hole?

America overtook the United States from 1790-McCutcheon.

Excuse me Eric Goldman Esq;

A culturally senile Eighth Circuit panel already affirmed the
American copy[rite] ritual to be a dark scary rabbit hole to avoid. A nervous, elderly panel affirmed Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren’s culturally senile ruling that moral copy[rites] to visual artwork were specifically exempted protections from unauthorized and potentially indecent usage “online” before the "online" existed. The statute, twisted by a culturally senile, Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, to protect unauthorized “online” publication of “art n_des”, was written in 1990 before an IMAGINARY “wholly new medium” had been alleged to be discovered by a culturally irrelevant oligarchy in 1997. This SCOTUS invention was written by an elderly oligarch who was 48 (two years older than this Plaintiff/Appellant) when humans first reached the moon.

The interconnected network of WIRES around the earth was alleged to be a wholly new medium by an elderly senior citizen failing to see these described precisely in the Communications Act of 1934. Perhaps this protection for unauthorized “online” publication of original naked images was done so one horny, elderly oligarch could review these and other naked images in secret? Perhaps. Perhaps not.

Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren did, in fact, appoint his attractive law clerk to magistrate judge three months before this moral claim first began by alleging moral copy[rite] violations.

Honorable Magistrate Erin L. Setser has a law degree but NEVER practiced law privately. This oligarch’s promotional career pathway extends from: 1) a law school; to 2) a law clerk; to 3) an Article III magistrate judge. WoW! 

This judicial law clerk’s years of wearing low-cut tops, tight jeans, and flirting were how she became a judge? Maybe this allegation is just too obvious to be true, maybe it is not. Maybe this was or there is still another equally personal motivation for her bias and was why she recommended dismissal of a party for calling a mistake by her former boss and appointing oligarch an indication of the early onset of mental senility? This cultural senility was and remains evident? We could ask a JURY like the United States once required for serious trials before the de facto repeal of the Sixth Amendment by America.

America’s [sic] “copyright” FRAUD used the compounding of “copy” and “rite” but intentionally did this to fool early Colonial Americans when Congress passed England’s, “1710 Statute of Anne”, or book printing ritual modified a tiny amount by Noah Webster, when writing the U.S. “Copy[rite] Act of 1790“.

This legal ritual or plagiarized English law established a formal procedure for monopolizing printing of early American schoolbooks so Noah Webster could encourage adoption of a wholly new language from the ‘American’ commoners dialect imported from England to the United States. The term “copyright” was in no dictionary on earth and no one word had yet been chosen for the ideal of personal ownership of intellectual property. Benjamin Franklin was an early U.S. polymath who felt the Constitution was too internationally important a document to be used to coin new words in 1787. Little Richard”, was a real sticker for words in his almanac.

The “coining” or first compounding of “RIGHT” and “copy” was around 1766 in England in “Commentaries on the Laws of England” in Volume II, “Rights of Things” in Chapter 26 p406. Sir William Blackstone called this out with two footnotes (M, L) and refers to prior use of “copy” and “right” with hyphenation in legal decisions announcing the existence of an individual human right to control original ideas even after physically fixed in writings, books, engravings, etc. Individual ideals had recently become able to be copied almost verbatim like “America's Copy[rite] Act” of 1790 copied the 1710 “Statute of Anne” from England though not current law in England at the time it was copied. America took United States' human rights back 80 years and these personal rights never developed here.

These ancient rulings protected a person's moral right to control re-publication of original ideas, images, or stories existing before fixation was done only as “he-said she-said” rumors or perhaps ideas found in unpublished diaries.

During the “Age of Enlightenment” Francis Bacon (1562-1626), René Descartes (1596-1650), John Locke (1632–1704), Baruch Spinoza (1632–1677), Pierre Bayle (1647–1706), Voltaire (1694–1778), Francis Hutcheson, (1694–1746), William Hogarth (1697-1764). David Hume (1711–1776), Cesare Beccaria (1738-1794), Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), Isaac Newton (1643–1727), and Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790) made unimaginable influences on human history.

Some of these began to perhaps write or publicly criticize government by a monarchy and espoused democratic, libertarian, or socialist ideals?  This often  offended the ruling oligarchy. One well-known author forbid use of an English law-book's term [sic] “copyright” that was not yet in authoritative dictionaries to deceive citizens in the Progress Clause of the Constitution. The continuing intentional misspelling of the compounding of rite as “right” was forbidden in 1787 but quickly followed this Founding Father's death in American laws in 1790 by Founding Father, Noah Webster, sixteen years before his American dictionary. This new term was not used in the first “State of the Union” speech by George Washington. The progress clause's rational for quick passage of the Copy[rite] Act of 1790 was discussed but no new word was used.

America did not develop this early MORAL RIGHT that developed for the rest of the Earth.

The Eighth Circuit Court of America has been asked to TODAY to obey U.S. laws and advised this is the last group of elderly oligarchs to be asked by ME! America of today is a clear moral failure of the otherwise honorable Rules of Law set up in 1787 due to a SPELLING MISTAKE.