|
1. Where you see "Donation..." place anything or leave it. This text will be revealed to Curtis Neeley. This can be a text up to 80 characters long used to later identify for posterity. $1, $5, $10 or anything will help. There were donations making the District filing possible. This will still be hard to continue alone financially but will be done.
2. In the box labeled $ put in the amount you wish to transfer. Supreme Court filing fees are $455, Eighth Circuit filing fees are $455, District Filing fees were $355. This will be pursued all the way to the Supreme Court with filing fees paid requiring $1,265 in filing fees alone.
3. After you click add to cart you will see the 'cart' in a new window. From this page chose to modify the 'cart' or proceed to complete the transfer. Credit cards are accepted and PayPal's "Bill me later" financing is an option but please help only if you feel it worth helping and you feel led. ============================================================================== It first appeared this District Court would rule against the pornternet because it appeared this District Court's honorable Jimm Larry Hendren was decidedly against internet pornography. THIS NOW APPEARS VERY WRONG after Dkt. #58! See the misleading search HERE then set DDG as your NEW search engine or accept being tracked by Google Inc. Mr Neeley asks for donations as a REFORMED sinner who once claimed to justify NAKED photography and continued NAKED photography as “high art”. Mr Neeley is SORRY and will not STOP trying till new RULES are LAW. Mr Neeley now agrees that all displays of NAKED humans violate the sanctity of the figure and should not be shown. Viewing the NAKED image of the opposite sex is reserved for marriage exclusively and this is common knowledge that Mr Neeley formerly rejected. This mistake should NOT be left as an option for CHILDREN. Mr Neeley began claiming to justify naked photography as “high art” back around '91-'92 and began sharing this online when [sic] "internet" users were debating image storage formats and the use of framesets. This was LONG before Google Inc existed. "Al Gore" had not yet invented the NET. Digital cameras and cell-phones did not exist the way they do today. As long as [sic] "internet" wire communications have existed, Mr Neeley claimed to justify showing NAKED human photography as “high art” and was considered very proficient by many. Mr Neeley's naked art was sold and collected internationally and was saved by others and is now reposted uninvited and is often posted with Mr Neeley's name. Mr Neeley once moderated the exclusive website where many of the other “greatest photographers” of the human figure as an art OBJECT presented their figurenude art. Figurenude is now only a testimony against display of NAKED humans. The display of the unclothed body is reserved for within marriage and, except for this, all display of the naked figure is sinful and offends God. The figurenude can be “high art” but viewership of this “high art” then violates the sanctity of the body created exclusively for spouses to share. Mr Neeley was wrong EVER to display the figurenude. The Great Counselor is leading Mr Neeley now to help make [sic] "internet" wire and radio communications SAFcc venues for viewing and "searching" and not remain the UNSAFcc venue primarily used to irresponsibly spread NAKEDNESS of any kind. Mr Neeley seeks to end all PORN nudity and all ART nudity displayed "online" to the anonymous who may be kids. Logged-in adults who choose to view NAKED images will still be allowed to view even obscenity. Mr Neeley believes the right to sin must be preserved and this right to chose is equivalent to the personal right to choose an abortion that no valid LAW can prevent. This litigation begun and Google Inc searches for Mr Neeley's name returned no NAKED images for the first time in history on March 30, 2012. Searches for Mr Neeley's name should never have returned NAKED images and especially not to children in school image searches. The Magistrate Judge once considering these claims IFP might not have allowed IFP status. DONATIONS offset enough of costs to make a paid case possible. Mr Neeley will now pursue this to SCOTUS since this is the Nineveh God led Mr Neeley to witness to. The whale has spit Mr Neeley out and Mr Neeley has sued the FCC, Google Inc, Microsoft Corporation and will pursue this until Mr Neeley meets the Great Counselor. The FCC, Google Inc, Microsoft Corporation, the United States Attorney for the Western District of Arkansas, and the Attorney General were served but honorable Jimm Larry Hendren dismissed them ALL. Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren dislikes only "child" pornography but apparently wishes to protect "wholesome legal American pornography" as was proven in Dkt #58. The completely open [sic] "internet" is immoral and improper and has been for decades. The FCC has known this for decades as have Google Inc and Microsoft Corporation. Google Inc is primarily a pornography provider and admitted having a corporate interest in keeping porn flowing as it does now in Court on December 6, 2010.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
