1. Where you see "Donation..." place anything or leave it. This text will be revealed to Curtis Neeley. This can be a text up to 80 characters used to later identify for posterity. $1, $5, $10 or anything will help. There were donations making the first District filing possible. This will still be hard to continue alone financially but will be done.
2. In the box labeled $ put in the amount you wish to donate. This will be pursued all the way to the Supreme Court with filing fees paid requiring about $2,000 in filing fees, printing supplies, and mailing costs alone.
3. After you click add to cart you will see the 'cart' in a new window. From this page choose to modify the 'cart' or proceed to complete the transfer. Credit cards are accepted and PayPal's "Bill me later" financing is an option but please help only if you feel it worth helping and you feel led.
Mr Neeley asks for donations as a REFORMED sinner who once claimed to justify NAKED photography and continued NAKED photography as “high art”.
Mr Neeley is SORRY and will not STOP trying till new RULES are LAW.
Mr Neeley now agrees that all displays of NAKED humans violate the sanctity of the figure and should not be shown due to being profane. Viewing the NAKED image of the opposite sex is reserved for marriage exclusively and this is common knowledge that Mr Neeley formerly rejected.
This mistake should NOT be left as an option for CHILDREN.
Neeley began claiming to justify naked photography as “high art” back
around '91-'92 and began sharing this online when [sic] "internet"
users were debating image storage formats and the use of
framesets. This was LONG before Google Inc existed. "Al Gore" had not yet invented the NET. Digital cameras and
cell-phones did not exist the way they do today. As long as [sic]
"internet" wire communications have existed, Mr Neeley claimed to
justify showing NAKED human photography as “high art” and was
considered very proficient by many. Mr Neeley's naked art was
sold and collected internationally and was saved by others and is now
reposted uninvited and is often posted with Mr Neeley's name. Mr Neeley
once moderated the exclusive website where many of the other “greatest
photographers” of the human figure as an art OBJECT presented their figurenude art.
Figurenude is now only a testimony against display of NAKED humans.
The display of the unclothed body is reserved for within marriage and, except for this, all display of the naked figure is sinful and is profane and offends God. The figurenude can be “high art” but viewership of this “high art” then violates the sanctity of the body created exclusively for spouses to share.
Mr Neeley was wrong EVER to display the figurenude. The Great Counselor is leading Mr Neeley now to make [sic] "internet" wire and radio communications SAFE for viewing and "searching" and not remain the UNSAFE venue primarily used to irresponsibly spread NAKEDNESS. Mr Neeley seeks to end all PORN nakedness and all ART nakedness displayed "online" to the anonymous who may be kids. Logged-in adults who choose to view NAKED images will still be allowed to view even obscenity. Mr Neeley believes the right to sin must be preserved and this right to chose is equivalent to the personal right to choose an abortion that no valid LAW will ever prevent.
This litigation begun and Google Inc searches for Mr Neeley's name returned no NAKED images for the first time in history on March 30, 2012. Searches for Mr Neeley's name should never have returned NAKED images and especially not to children in school image searches.
Mr Neeley will now pursue this to SCOTUS again since this is the Nineveh God led Mr Neeley to witness to. The whale has spit Mr Neeley out and Mr Neeley refused to witness and went so far as to became the tour guide to the NAKED ART district of Nineveh. Mr Neeley will sue the FCC, Google Inc, Microsoft Corporation continually and will pursue this until Mr Neeley meets the Great Counselor.
completely unregulated, open [sic] "internet" is immoral and improper and has been
for decades. The FCC has known this for decades as have Google Inc and
Microsoft Corporation. Google Inc is primarily a pornography provider
and admitted having a corporate interest in keeping porn flowing as it
does now in Court on December 6, 2010.